Reviewer Guidelines
Guidance for reviewers assessing ADHD manuscripts.
Journal at a Glance
ISSN: 3066-8042
DOI Prefix: 10.14302/issn.3066-8042
License: CC BY 4.0
Peer reviewed open access journal
Scope Alignment
ADHD research spanning neuroscience, clinical care, education, and lived experience. We prioritize evidence that improves assessment, treatment, and long term support across the lifespan.
Publishing Model
Open access, single blind peer review, and rapid publication after acceptance and production checks. Metadata validation and DOI registration are included.
JAC reviewers evaluate methodological rigor, data transparency, and ADHD relevance in submissions. Reviews should be constructive, objective, and aligned with journal policies.
Reviewers are expected to maintain confidentiality and disclose any potential conflicts before accepting an assignment.
- Population definition, inclusion criteria, and setting
- Appropriate study design and statistical analysis
- Clarity of outcomes, measures, and time points
- Ethics approvals, consent, and privacy safeguards
- Relevance to ADHD care or education
Scope Fit
Confirm alignment with ADHD priorities.
Methods
Assess study design and reporting quality.
Results
Check clarity, consistency, and interpretation.
Transparency
Verify data availability and ethics statements.
Manuscripts under review are confidential. Reviewers should not share content or use unpublished data. If a conflict of interest exists, notify the editorial office promptly so assignments can be adjusted.
Submit reports within the requested timeframe and inform the editorial office early if more time is needed. Organize feedback into major and minor points so authors can prioritize revisions, and maintain a respectful tone.
Clear, actionable comments support faster editorial decisions.
JAC is committed to rigorous, transparent publishing in ADHD research and care. We emphasize reproducible study design, clear reporting of clinical and functional outcomes, and ethical compliance across all article types.
The editorial office supports authors, editors, and reviewers with clear guidance and responsive communication. For questions about scope or workflow, contact [email protected].
We encourage continuous improvement in reporting practices and share updates that help the community maintain high standards in neurodevelopmental science, clinical care, and educational practice.
Interested in Reviewing?
Join our reviewer community to support ADHD research.
