Reviewer Resources
Tools and guidance for effective cardiovascular manuscript evaluation.
Reviewer Support Center
Resources to help reviewers provide thorough, constructive evaluations of cardiovascular research.
Our manuscript management system provides reviewers with tools to access submissions, submit reports, and communicate efficiently with editors.
Manuscript Access
Secure online access to assigned cardiovascular manuscripts and supplementary materials.
Review Forms
Structured evaluation templates ensuring comprehensive assessment of cardiological research.
Communication Tools
Secure messaging for confidential editor communications regarding review assignments.
- Criteria for assessing cardiovascular research methodology and validity
- Reporting standards expectations (CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA)
- Statistical review considerations for cardiology studies
- Ethical compliance verification requirements
Best practices: Focus on constructive feedback that helps authors improve their cardiovascular research presentation. Balance critique with specific suggestions for improvement.
JHC provides orientation materials for new reviewers covering evaluation criteria, ethics considerations, and effective feedback techniques for cardiovascular manuscript review.
For questions about review assignments or technical issues, contact [email protected]. Editorial staff can assist with access issues, deadline extensions, or specialized guidance. Response times are typically within one business day for urgent matters.
Effective reviews balance constructive critique with practical suggestions for improvement, helping authors strengthen their cardiovascular research submissions and enhance publication quality.
Access Reviewer Portal
Log in to manage your cardiovascular review assignments and submit evaluations.
Reviewer Login
