Journal of Hypertension and Cardiology

Journal of Hypertension and Cardiology

Journal of Hypertension and Cardiology

Current Issue Volume No: 1 Issue No: 3

Review Article Open Access Available online freely Peer Reviewed Citation

Vascular graft failure of leg arterial bypasses - a review

Richa Handa 1,   Sanjiv Sharma 1  

1Dept. of Medicine, Central Cardiology Medical Clinic, Bakersfield, CA

Author Contributions
Received 21 Apr 2014; Accepted 04 Aug 2014; Published 08 Oct 2014;

Academic Editor: Prasenjit Guchhait, Assistant Professor, Thrombosis Research Division, Cardiovascular Research Section. Department of Medicine. Baylor College of Medicine.

Checked for plagiarism: Yes

Review by: Single-blind

Copyright ©  2014 Richa Handa, MBBS, et al.

License
Creative Commons License     This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Competing interests

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Citation:

Richa Handa, Sanjiv Sharma (2014) Vascular graft failure of leg arterial bypasses - a review. Journal of Hypertension and Cardiology - 1(3):17-21. https://doi.org/10.14302/issn.2329-9487.jhc-14-404

Download as RIS, BibTeX, Text (Include abstract )

DOI 10.14302/issn.2329-9487.jhc-14-404

Introduction

A major problem facing the vascular surgeon is graft failure. Patients are often more symptomatic after graft failure than they were before the bypass procedure 1. Vein graft failure can be divided into three phases, depending on the timing of failure: early (<30 days), intermediate (30 days–2 years) and late (>2 years) 1, 2. Acute graft failures (within 48 hrs.) are usually secondary to technical errors such as poor anastomosis, poor inflow or outflow or a retained unlysed valve cusps 1, 2. Graft failure occurring between 2 days and 12 weeks after surgery is usually secondary to increased graft thromboreactivity 1, 3, 4. All grafts or reconstructions involve thromboreactivity but it varies in intensity and duration and is governed by both host factors (coagulability and blood flow), and by graft factors (surface thrombogenicity and compliance) 3. The thrombotic threshold velocity is required to maintain graft patency and thrombosis and closure of the graft occur for velocities below a given level for any graft material 3. The cause of intermediate vein graft failure is intimal hyperplasia 1, 5. Anastomotic intimal hyperplasia is commonly greater at the downstream or at the outflow anastomosis 6. Late vein graft failure is generally caused by dyslipidemia and the progression of atherosclerosis, compromising either inflow or outflow

vessels 1, 5.

Structural failures are rare in modern day fabric prostheses 7. Dilatation of the graft results in bleeding though intercises of graft, breakdown of fiber resulting in holes and tears, mural thrombus deposition which finally leads to graft occlusion, and can form anastomotic aneurysms 3, 8. Knitted fabrics have much more stretch because of their looped structure even though woven grafts with interlocking yarns have little or no inherentstretch 9. Dilation is caused by the loops straightening in the line of greatest stress 3. Patients with these grafts require life time follow-up 3. Advanced degeneration requires replacement of the graft 3, 10.

A partial or complete separation of the prosthetic graft from the host artery can lead to an anastomotic false aneurysm 11. False aneurysms are most commonly found at the common femoral artery 3, 11. Atherosclerotic degenerative changes in the host artery wall are the cause of the tear 3, 12. Other factors leading to the formation of false aneurysm are compliance mismatch between the host artery and the graft, incorrect suturing technique, infection and tension on the suture line 3. Rupture, thrombosis, and embolism are some of the complications of false aneurysm 3, 12. An anastomotic false aneurysm should be surgically repaired when diagnosed. In the elderly or high risk patients, small false aneurysms (2 cm) can be left untreated but require close monitoring and any sign of expansion mandates repair 3, 13.

One of the most serious complications of arterial reconstruction is graft infection 3, 14. It is a failure of the bypass procedure, even though infection does not necessarily lead to graft thrombosis 3, 15. To control the problem, the entire infected graft must usually be removed followed by revascularization by an extra-anatomical route 3, 14.

When replacing or bypassing an arterial segment with a vascular graft, the graft does not always behave like a normal artery 3. In order to provide the most durable conduit, a number of properties of the graft must be controlled such as the diameter and the length in order to provide adequate flow to the distal arterial tree 3, 16. The distensibility or compliance of the vessel plays an important role in the impedance to pulsatile flow 3, 18. Compliant grafts are more likely to remain patent than stiff, non-compliant grafts 3, 17. The inferior performance and decreased patency of small and medium sized grafts is due to mismatch in viscoelastic properties 3, 18.

A significant proportion of patients will appear well compensated after graft thrombosis 3. Also, patients whose general health status has declined to the point where active ambulation is no longer realistic may benefit most from simple observation 3. At the time of presentation, the majority of patients who were originally operated for severe ischemia will suffer from recurrent ischemia or claudication 3, 19. For limb preservation and maintenance of independent function, these patients require revascularization 3, 20. An entirely new secondary bypass graft is needed for the majority of patients with failed bypass grafts and recurrent ischemia 3, 21. In patients with graft failure, endovascular therapy resulted in reasonable patency and limb salvage with less complications and durable results at least for the first 15 months of their secondary procedures 22. The first choice for revascularization whenever an intervention is needed after femoropopliteal graft failure should be endovascular therapy 22.

The rate of amputation after bypass surgery is influenced by the indication for operation, with a worse outcome for critical limb ischemia (CLI) than for intermittent claudication (IC) 23. The ischemic consequences of femoropopliteal bypass graft occlusion are more severe with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) than with saphenous vein resulting in a higher amputation rate 23, 24. No effect was seen of oral anticoagulants and aspirin in terms of the amputation rate after bypass failure 23, 25. Failed polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts show a significant deterioration in pressure indices when compared with their preoperative values 26.

Fate of limb after failed femoropopliteal reconstruction has been studied 27. The level of amputation or the need for amputation is not related to the age of the patient and there was a wide range from the time of thrombosis to amputation 27. The amputations are rare if the reason for doing bypass is claudication 27, 28. The need for amputation in thrombosed grafts is determined by their inflow and run off status, level of distal anastomosis and gangrene before the procedure 27. Amputation is usually delayed or prevented due to vigorous attempts at revision of failed grafts 27.

References

  1. 1.Wain Reese A, Veith Frank J, Marin Michael L.Takao Ohki, William D Suggs. et al. (Aug-99) Analysis of Endovascular Graft Treatment for Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease. Ann Surg. 230(2), 145.
  1. 2. (2005) Is duplex surveillance of value after leg vein bypass grafting? Principal results of the Vein Graft Surveillance randomised Trial (VGST). , Circulation 112, 1985-1913.
  1. 3.Zelt David T, Abbott William M. (1994) Vascular prostheses In:. Morris PJ, Malt RA, eds Oxford Textbook of Surgery , Oxford: Oxford .
  1. 4.TS Monahan. (2009) Owens CD risk factors for lower-extremity vein graft failure. Semin Vasc Surg. 22, 216-226.
  1. 5.MG Davies, Po Hagen. (1995) Pathophysiology of vein graft failure:a review. , Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 9, 7-18.
  1. 6.LoGerfo F W, Quist W C, Nowak M D, Crawshaw H M, Haudenschild C C. (1983) Downstream anastomotic hyperplasia A mechanism of failure in Dacron arterial grafts. Ann Surg Apr. 479-483.
  1. 7.Damme H Van, Deprez M, Creemers E, Limet R. (2005) Intrinsic Structural Failure of Polyester (Dacron) Vascular Grafts, A General Review. Acta chir belg. 105, 249-255.
  1. 8.Hoed P Den, Veen H. (1992) The late complications of aorto-ilio-femoral Dacron prostheses: dilatation and anastomotic aneurysm formation. , Eur J Vasc Surg 6, 282-287.
  1. 9.NUNN D. (1999) Structural failure of Dacron arterial grafts. , Semin Vasc Surg 12, 83-91.
  1. 10. (2000) Endovascular repair of aortic allograft aneurysmal degeneration: A case report. , Journal of Vascular Surgery. Volume 32, 1222-1224.
  1. 11.Satiani B. (1981) False aneurysms following arterial reconstruction. Surg Gynecol Obstet.152:. 357-63.
  1. 12.. Greenfield’s Surgery: Scientific Principles and Practice. 5th edition .
  1. 13.Dawson I, RB Sie, JH van Bockel. (1997) Atherosclerotic popliteal aneurysm. , Br J Surg.84: 293-299.
  1. 14. (2004) Luís Henrique Gil França1, Henrique Jorge Stahlke Jr. , J Vasc Br 3(2), 137-44.
  1. 15.KD Calligaro. (2001) Infrainguinal prosthetic graft infection In: Cronenwett JL, Rutherford RB Decision making in vascular surgery. , Philadelphia: W B Saunders Co 208-211.
  1. 16.Moore Wesley S.Vascular and Endovascular Surgery: A Comprehensive Review. 8th edition.
  1. 17.Hason JE, Megerman J, Abbott M. (1988) Increased compliance at vascular anastomoses. J Vasc Surg. 207-717.
  1. 18.RN Baird, WM Abbott. (1976) Pulsatile blood-flow in arterial grafts. , The Lancet 30, 948-9.
  1. 19.WJ Quiñones-Baldrich, Prego A, Ucelay-Gomez R. (1991) Failure of PTFE infrainguinal revascularization: patterns, management alternatives and outcome. Ann Vasc Surg. 5, 163-169.
  1. 20.JE Edwards, LM Taylor, JM Porter. (1990) Treatment of failed lower extremity bypass grafts with new autogenous vein bypass grafting. , J VASC SURG 11, 136-145.
  1. 21. (1986) Recognition and management of impending vein graft failure. , Arch Surg 121, 758-759.
  1. 22.Sharkawy M, Samadoni A El, El-Maadawy M, Farghly A. (2011) Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University , Native Artery Endovascular Reconstruction Vs Redo Surgery after Femoro Popliteal Graft Failure. Kasr El Aini Journal of Surgery. , VOL 12.
  1. 23.. Outcome After Occlusion of Infrainguinal Bypasses in the Dutch BOA Study: Comparison of Amputation Rate in Venous and Prosthetic Grafts. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 30, 604.
  1. 24.Klinkert P, Post P N, Breslau P J, Bockel J H Van. (2004) Saphenous vein versus PTFE for above-knee femoropopliteal bypass A review of the literature. , Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 27, 357-362.
  1. 25.Bypass Dutch. (2000) Oral anticoagulants or Aspirin (BOA). , Lancet 355, 346-351.
  1. 26.P1 Renwick, Johnson B, Wilkinson A, Galloway J, McCollum P. (1999) Vascular surgical society of great britain and ireland: limb outcome following failed femoropopliteal polytetrafluoroethylene bypass for intermittent claudication. , Br J Surg 86(5), 693.
  1. 27.DL Wooster, JL Provan. (1982) Fate of the limb after failed femoropopliteal reconstruction.Can. PubMed , J Surg 25(4), 393-7.
  1. 28.Reunanen A, Takkunen H, Aromaa A. (1982) Prevalence of intermittent claudication and its effect on mortality. , Acta Med Scand 211, 249-256.

Cited by (10)

  1. 1.King William E., Bowlin Gary L., 2022, Near-field electrospinning of polydioxanone small diameter vascular graft scaffolds, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 130(), 105207, 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105207
  1. 2.Colombo Monika, Corti Anna, McGinty Sean, Migliavacca Francesco, Chiastra Claudio, 2022, , , (), 215, 10.1016/B978-0-323-85740-6.00009-1
  1. 3.Rodriguez-Soto Maria A., Riveros Alejandra, Suarez Vargas Natalia, Garcia-Brand Andres J., Camargo Carolina Muñoz, et al, 2022, Failure Analysis of TEVG’s II: Late Failure and Entering the Regeneration Pathway, Cells, 11(6), 939, 10.3390/cells11060939
  1. 4.Fang Shu, Ellman Ditte Gry, Andersen Ditte Caroline, 2021, Review: Tissue Engineering of Small-Diameter Vascular Grafts and Their In Vivo Evaluation in Large Animals and Humans, Cells, 10(3), 713, 10.3390/cells10030713
  1. 5.GRUSOVA G., LAMBERT L., KAVAN J., LAMBERTOVA A., BURGETOVA A., et al, 2018, Natural Remodeling of the Distal Anastomosis of an Above-Knee Femoropopliteal Bypass Depicted by CT Angiography of Lower Limbs Improves Geometry of the Reconstruction, Physiological Research, (), 857, 10.33549/physiolres.933911
  1. 6. Miah Mohammad Mostafizur Rahman, Avabde Dani, Ghahramani Isabella, Hemanth Raehan, Abbas Ridda, et al, 2024, Graft Failure After Revascularization for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischaemia (CLTI) Patients: The Role of Graft Surveillance, Cureus, (), 10.7759/cureus.53036
  1. 7.Rodriguez-Soto Maria A., Suarez Vargas Natalia, Riveros Alejandra, Camargo Carolina Muñoz, Cruz Juan C., et al, 2021, Failure Analysis of TEVG’s I: Overcoming the Initial Stages of Blood Material Interaction and Stabilization of the Immune Response, Cells, 10(11), 3140, 10.3390/cells10113140
  1. 8.Teveris Victoria, Columbo Jesse, Bartline Peter, Goodney Philip, Stone David, et al, 2020, Selective Use of Anticoagulation or Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for Patients with Extra-anatomic Bypasses, Annals of Vascular Surgery, 66(), 272, 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.01.016
  1. 9.CHAR Sydney, RUDNICKI Pamela, MACKEY William, GUO Lifei, 2023, Ethnicity-based differences in thrombosis in lower extremity vascular bypass: a review of current literature, International Angiology, 41(6), 10.23736/S0392-9590.22.04811-8
  1. 10.Flores-Rojas Guadalupe Gabriel, Gómez-Lazaro Bélen, López-Saucedo Felipe, Vera-Graziano Ricardo, Bucio Emilio, et al, 2023, Electrospun Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering: A Review, Macromol, 3(3), 524, 10.3390/macromol3030031