Reviewer Guidelines

Standards and expectations for JHP peer reviewers.

The Backbone of Scientific Quality

Reviewers are essential to maintaining JHP's reputation for rigorous, ethical psychological research.

Peer review is the cornerstone of credible scientific publishing. This guide outlines the expectations and best practices for reviewers contributing to the Journal of Human Psychology.

Core Responsibilities

Evaluate manuscripts objectively for scientific validity, clarity, and contribution to the field.
Complete reviews within the agreed-upon timeframe (typically 14-21 days).
Declare any conflicts of interest before accepting a review assignment.
Maintain strict confidentiality of all manuscript contents.
Provide constructive, specific, and respectful feedback to guide authors.

Review Criteria

When evaluating a manuscript, consider:

Originality and novelty of the research question.
Appropriateness and rigor of the methodology.
Clarity of data presentation and statistical analysis.
Soundness of conclusions relative to the results.
Adherence to ethical standards and JHP's scope.

Ethical Conduct

Reviewers must adhere to COPE guidelines. Do not use ideas or data from a manuscript under review for personal benefit. Report any suspected ethical violations to the Editor-in-Chief immediately.