Abstract
This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of socked pigeon pea seed meal on Growth and Food Utilization Efficiency of Nile tilapia (
Author Contributions
Copyright© 2023
M. Yagoub Hassan, et al.
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Competing interests The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding Interests:
Citation:
Introduction
Food security is a pressing global issue as the human population is projected to reach between 7.5 and 10.5 billion by 2050
Materials And Methods
Total number of (200) Juveniles of Nile tilapia ( Pigeon peas, Wheat bran, Groundnut Cake, sorghum and fishmeal were acquired from halt kuku Market and were manually sorted to remove impurities. The premix (Mineral Mix) was obtained from livestock shop. Manufactured by using electrical balance (Model; 2003, Max; 200g cl; 0.001g, AC; 220W/50HZ, S/N; 11g, SF; 400). In attempting to remove anti- nutritional factors, seeds were soaked by dipping them in water in plastic container for 24 hours with soaking ratio of 100 g/300 ml (1:3w/v) at room temperature. After soaking, the seeds were oven dried at 60°C overnight. Pigeon peas were milled by using milling machine and stored in name labelled containers prior to analysis. Chemical composition to determine composition of raw and soaked Pigeon pea seeds was carried out according to standard method adopted by Association of Official Analytical Chemists DM= Dry Matter. CP= Crude Protein. EE= Ether Extract. CF= Crude Fibre.NFE= Nitrogen Free Extract. Diets were formulated to replace 0% (control), 25%, 50%, and 75% of fishmeal. And give up to 30% crude protein. During compounding of diets, the weighed proportions of dry milled ingredients were carefully mixed by hand before adding water. The mixture was then passed through meat machine with 0.5 mm sieve size to make pellets. Pellets were then dried by passing in the oven for 6 hours at 40°C and then spread on the floor under room temperature for one week prior to packaging. Composition of experimental Diets (g/100 g diet) is shown in 1-Fishmeal 49% CP; Pigeon pea 18.4% CP; Groundnut Cake 44.8% CP; Dora fitrita 11.5% CP and Wheat bran 15.7%. 2-Mineral mixture (g/100g dry diet) calcium biphosphate 13.57; calcium lactate 32.69; ferric citrate 02.97; magnesium sulphate 13.20; potassium phosphate (dibasic) 23.98; sodium biphosphate 08.72; sodium chloride 04.35; almunium chloride.6H2O 0.0154; potassium iodide 0.015; cuprous chloride 0.010; mangnous sulphate H20 0.080; cobalt chloride. 6H2O 0.100; zinc sulphate. 7H2O 0.40 The experimental design was a completely randomized design (CRD). 120 Nile tilapia fingerlings with initial average body weight and length (3.4±0.01g) and 3.2±0.00 respectively, were randomly distributed in plastic Tanks (Aquarium) with a capacity of 20 litres at a stocking density of 10 Nile tilapia per bucket. Fish were fed four times a day according their appetite; diets were given at periods (8:30, 11:00, 14:00 and 17:00 o clock), at 5% of body weight throughout the experimental period. The quantity of feed was adjusted weekly based on the weight of fish to avoid feed wastage and deterioration of water quality parameters (dissolved oxygen, ammonia, temperature and PH). A Remaining feeds at the end of the week were weighed and used to estimate feed intake. Fish were weighed prior to the start of each experiment to obtain fish of consistent size and weight. A top pan balance was used in weighing procedures. Fish were acclimated to 6 Experimental environment for 10 days and fed control diet. After the acclimation period fish were netted from each plastic bucket using a fine mesh hand net and total weighed. The dietary treatments were at random assigned to the plastic buckets. Total weighing of experimental fish was done weekly throughout the experiment. The study lasted for 60 days during which fish were fed the experimental diets containing Pigeon pea seed meal. Parameters measured were bulk initial weight, bulk final weight and feed intake. Etch 10 days weight gain was measured to monitor growth while other parameters were calculated as described below: Specific growth rate (SGR) (% day (SGR) (% day-1) % = {In Wt2- In Wt1/t2- t1} × 100 Average Daily weight gain Average Daily weight gain (ADWG) (day-1) = (Wt2- Wt1)/ t. Where: Wt2= final weight (g) at time t2 (end of experiment) Wt1= Initial weight (g) at time t1 (beginning of experiment) and In = Natural logarithm. t= time (day) Feed conversion ratio (FCR) = Weight of food fed (g) /increased weight (g) Feed intake (FI) (g day-1)) = Total feed intake /number of days Protein productive value (PPV %) = (P2 - PI) ×100 / Protein intake (g) Where: P2: Protein content in fish carcass at the end; PI: Protein content at the start. Survival rate (SR) = {N2/N1} × 100 Where: N2-Number of fish at the end of the experiment N1- Number of fish at the beginning of the experiment . Data collected from this experiment were subjected to one - way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Comparisons of treatment means were done by LSD Honest at 5% level of significance. Analyses were performed using SPSS software version16.
Type
DM
CP%
EE%
CF%
Ash
NFE
raw
91.63
20.13
2.42
10.50
3.47
55.11
Soaked
79.22
18.40
1.99
3.98
2.43
35.66
Ingredients Treatments
T (0%)
T (25%)
T (50%)
T (75%)
Fish Meal %
24
18
12
6
Pigeon pea %
0.0
6
12
18
Groundnut Cake %
30.4
35
39
43.4
Wheat Bran %
28
27
25
22
Dora fitrita %
17
13.4
11.4
10
Mineral Mix %
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
Vegetable Oil %
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
Vitamin mixture %
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
Results
The study demonstrated that there were significant differences (p≤0.05) in the (WG g/Fish), (DWG g/Fish) and (SGR) of mono-sex Nile tilapia ( WG = weight gain, DWG = daily weight growth and SGR%= specific growth rate Data are re resented as mean of three samples replicates ± standard error. Sig= Significant Ns= no Significant a,b,c Means in the same Column with the same letter are Significantly different at (p≤0.05). Data are represented as mean of three samples replicates ± standard error. Means in the same row with the same letter are not significant difference (P>0.05) Results in Results in FCR =feed conversion ratio, PPV = Protein productive value, K (%) = condition factor, SR (%) = survival rate. Data are represented as mean of three samples replicates ± standard error. a,b,c Means in the same Column with the same letter are Significant different at (p≤0.05) NS: No Significant different at (p≥0.05) Results in regime T3 (2.50±0.40) and T0 (4.88±0.95) respectively (the differences was due to electricity problems, losing their appetite and at the end the mortality rate increased) Data are represented as mean of three samples replicates ± standard error a,b,c Means in the same row with the same letter are not significantly different (P>0.05) Results in Data are represented as mean of three samples replicates ± standard deviation. a,b,c Means in the same row with the same letter are Significant different at (p≤0.05) NS: NO Significant different at (p≥0.05) IL = initial length, FL = final length.
Treats Parameters
Initial weight
final weight
WG
DWG g/d
SGR%
0%
3.4±0.01ᵃ
8.93±0.44ᵃ
6.63±0.73ᵃ
0.13±0.01ᵃ
2.93±0.73ᵃ
25%
3.4±0.03ᵃ
9.46±0.33ᵃ
5.70±0.53ᵃ
0.11±0.01ᵃ
2.40±0.53ᵃ
50%
3.3±0.05ᵃ
8.10±0.28ᵃᵇ
4.08±0.08ᵃᵇ
0.08±0.00ᵇ
0.78±0.08ᵇ
75%
3.3±0.06ᵃ
7.33±0.44ᵇ
3.83±0.03ᵇ
0.07±0.00ᵇ
0.53±0.03ᵇ
Sig.
Ns
*
*
*
*
Diets %
Weight of fish (g) at different times
0 times
10 days
20 days
30 days
40 days
50 days
Increment (g)
T 0.0
3.4±0.01ᵃ
4.37±0.29ᵃᵇ
5.60±0.26ᵃ
7.35±0.27ᵇ
8.82±0.24ᵃ
8.83±0.44ᵃ
5.79±0.41
T 25
3.4±0.03ᵃ
4.74±0.33ᵃ
6.36±0.27ᵃ
8.06±0.23ᵃ
9.04±0.12ᵃ
9.46±0.33ᵃ
6.06±0.30
T 50
3.3±0.05ᵃ
4.14±0.04ᵇ
4.60±0.27ᵇ
7.38±0.26ᶜ
7.60±0.26ᵇ
8.10±0.28ᵃᵇ
4.80±0.23
T 75
3.3±0.06ᵃ
4.06±0.02ᵇ
4.78±0.08ᵇ
5.68±0.36ᵈ
5.91±0.41ᶜ
7.33±0.44ᵇ
4.03±0.38
parameters Treats
T0 (0.0%)
T1 (25%)
T2 (50%)
T3 (75%)
Sig
Feed intake (g)
55.84±0.00ᶜ
65.29±0.00ᵃ
59.79±0.00ᵇ
53.15±0.00ᵇ
*
FCR (g)
0.86±0.85ᶜ
1.20±0.19ᵇ
1.49±0.30ᵃ
1.12±0.10ᵇ
*
PPV (g)
39.33±0.19ᵃ
34.33±0.00ᵃ
33.66±0.00ᵇ
29.00±0.19ᶜ
*
K (%)
1.26±0.16a
1.19±0.16a
1.21±0.11a
1.29±0.36a
NS
SR (%)
98.27±2.9a
95.10±3.8 b
90.12±3.6c
91.59±6.6 c
*
Diets
Feed intake (%) at different sample
1(15%)
2(12%)
3(9%)
4(6%)
5(3%)
T 0(0.0)
13.78c
14.15a
12.25ᵇ
9.78ᶜ
5.88ᶜ
T1 (25%)
12.80 d
13.86b
15.39ᵃ
15.40ᵃ
7.84ᵃ
T2 (50%)
13.80a
14.17a
12.63ᶜ
12.63ᵇ
6.56ᵇ
T3 (75%)
12.99 b
13.98b
10.48ᵈ
10.20ᵈ
5.50ᵈ
Parameters Treats
T0 (0.0%)
T1 (25%)
T2 (50%)
T3 (75%)
Sig
IL (cm)
3.4±0.00b
3.5±0.00a
3.3±0.00c
3.4±0.00b
NS
FL (Cm)
8.83±0.44ᵃ
9.16±0.33ᵃ
8.50±0.28ᵃᵇ
7.33±0.44ᵇ
*
Discussion
The study was conducted to evaluate the effect of adding pigeon pea seeds of four experimental diets (0%, 25%, 50% and 75%) containing socked pigeon peas seed meal, as replacement of fish meal on the growth Performance and carcass composition of
Conclusion
Based on the results obtained from replacement of fish meal, by processing of Pigeon peas in cold water (1:3w/v) for 24 hours under room temperature has significant influence on the nutritive value of Pigeon peas. However slight reduction in dry matter, crude lipid and ash content has occurred. The results of this study show that processed Pigeon peas seed can be included in Nile tilapia diets at 25% level without harmful effect in terms of growth performance and feed utilization of Nile tilapia fingerlings. It is therefore concluded that whenever the cost of Pigeon peas is than fish meal, fish farmers can use soaked Pigeon peas to replace up to 25% fish meal in Nile tilapia diets as a way of reducing the current demand pressure on fish meal.